Open Education Open Education

Shoot-em Up Video Games – The Cause of Greater Anti-social Behaviors in Teens?

If you are a parent of a teen today you are no doubt concerned about what you hear regarding violent video games. Generally speaking, there appears to be a wide-spread consensus that such games are the bane of society and the source of growing anti-social and risk-taking behavior in teens.

At the same time, if you have discussed the issue at length with other parents you are also likely confused about violent video game play. Because, quite frankly, many teens are playing such games without the slightest indication of any negative impact on their psyche or their mental health never mind a propensity to act in a violent way towards others.
Amazon.com

Now comes the work of Drs. Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl K. Olson, the authors of the breakthrough book, “Grand Theft Childhood.” In their text the authors indicate that the politicians and even some health professionals may in fact have it all wrong.

One Who Has Previously Raised Concerns About Such Games
As a parent of two grown daughters, my early exposure to computer video games consisted of two very distinct categories. First, there were the earliest creations. PacMan, Donkey Kong, and the bubbly Mario all graced our computer and television screens. My children enjoyed these games, fervently trying to improve upon past accomplishments as they sought to find a way to reach the “next level”. These games, played individually or by two people together, were available to our children as a reward when other tasks were completed.

GameSpot.comLater came the Sony’s PlayStation interactive games. The games that I became most familiar with were those that combined graphic caricatures of real professional athletes with very authentic strategies. Madden football or basketball were games that enticed teenagers and grown-ups alike. Though I never played them I was also familiar with the other popular game options based on skateboarding, skiing stunts, and the obnoxious world of professional wrestling.

I must admit, when I first became aware of shoot-em up games I had in mind games where a player might shoot spaceships out of the sky. Somehow I missed the initial release of the Grand Theft Auto series, becoming aware of the game only as Grand Theft Auto3 was to be released.

I was absolutely astonished to learn of the details within this game series. Using a joystick, the gamer controls a virtual thug. Basically, if it involves criminal-like behavior, the action is available to you as the game player through the virtual character you control.

The gamer can have his thug hijack cars, even police vehicles if he desires to. The gamer’s thug can rob a bank or opt to run a crime-laden vigilante organization.

As for random acts of violence, the gamer can bash into the rear end of a car plodding along too slowly or provide his/her thug a baseball bat as he roams the streets of a virtual city. On impulse, the game player can have the thug take the bat and strike any of the pedestrians he encounters, be they unsuspecting elderly people minding their own business or street-walking prostitutes soliciting customers.

A Failure to Understand the Lure of Such Games
Upon examination of the game I was at least relieved to see it carried with it a mature rating. The game certainly was not for young children. But upon further examination I personally couldn’t help ask who this type of game might be for?

GameSpot.comAt the time that Grand Theft Auto3 was the rage, Joanna Weiss of the Boston Globe published an article that featured interviews with some admitted game aficionados. What gave me the greatest concern were the words of the game players themselves.

Each indicated Grand Theft Auto contained graphics and interactive options that were so realistic that gamers felt immersed in the world the game simulates. According to Ms. Weiss, a 23 year-old computer programmer from York, England acknowledged the enjoyment the game gave him, especially after a grueling day of work. He stated, “Some people play squash after work. I just squash pedestrians.”

Weiss also noted an Emerson college freshmen reportedly calling GTA3 more exciting than other shoot-em ups. It’s a “different kind of violence,” she said, “because there’s no real good intent to any of it”.

Upon reading that article, I went on to write an op ed article for my local papers noting my concerns about these games. As a parent and educator, I noted the tremendous difficulty I had understanding the comments of the adults that Weiss spoke with. I also wrote how I could not comprehend what playing such games could do for the emotional psyche.

And lastly, for this writer, the concept of an interactive game that involves violence against people was even more troubling than the movies of Hollywood. My rationale was that the decision to make this rogue character act violently was based upon a conscious choice by the game player.

Simply stated, I found the unconscionable acts available to the player in the Grand Theft Auto series extremely troubling. At the time I was horrified by the thought that there might be many parents who thought of the bubbly Mario when thinking about video games. I expressed great concerns that many parents might be completely unaware of the content of this game, or even that such games exist.

Recent Developments – Contradictory Viewpoints
University of MinnesotaSoon, studies began to emerge that gave further rise to other concerns about such games. A University of Minnesota Professor and researcher released a number of articles noting some troubling findings. In one such study, Professor Sonya Brady, Phd, indicated that “violent video games create more permissive attitudes toward risky behaviors — such as using drugs — in youths who play those games.”

Over the past couple of years we have heard a number of politicians and children’s mental health experts rail against these games. In addition, many more reports had been released that indicated correlations between violent acts in school and a desire to play violent video games. Essentially, all of the material making its way before the public appeared to reinforce my personal view points regarding these games.

It was then that I stumbled across the work of Kutner and Olson, two researchers who happened to question this conventional wisdom. Back in 2004, they gathered together several researchers for a two year, $1.5-million multifaceted study of violent video games and children.

Their study involved researchers from a variety of fields: child and adolescent psychiatry, adult psychiatry, public health, clinical psychology, developmental psychology, educational psychology, and public policy. The goal was to examine the issue of violent video games from a broad set of perspectives.

It should be noted that unlike the prior work of Dr. Brady, they conducted a study instead of setting up an artificial experiment. For their data, they sought to “study real families in real situations.”

The researchers noted that much of what they uncovered surprised them. They noted, “The data were both encouraging and, at times, disturbing.” But they also noted, “It’s clear that the “big fears” bandied about in the press—that violent video games make children significantly more violent in the real world; that they will engage in the illegal, immoral, sexist and violent acts they see in some of these games—are not supported by the current research, at least in such a simplistic form.”

GrandTheftChildhood.comAcknowledging straight up that the findings surprised them proved to be the one hook to get this writer to read further. A second aspect, that Kutner and Olson note that “violent juvenile crime in the United States reached a peak in 1993 and has been declining ever since” created further questioning of my current assumptions.

As I delved further, I found a realistic treatment of an exceptionally complex topic and a study/book worthy of a thorough examination. Next up, we share with our readers an interview with Dr. Olson and a look at the various myths dispelled by her and Dr. Kutner’s research.

14 comments

1 Author Reveals “The Surprising Truth About Violent Video Games” — Open Education { 03.17.08 at 9:25 pm }

[...] my previous post, I acknowledged a long-standing personal concern regarding the potential detrimental effects of [...]

2 Shaan { 03.19.08 at 5:35 pm }

Very interesting read

3 Tricia { 03.24.08 at 3:29 pm }

Great Reading thank you so much. We will be posting a link back to this article

4 Grand Theft Childhood Author Weighs in on GTA IV — Open Education { 05.16.08 at 9:12 am }

[...] in March, we did a three-part segment on violent video games. At the time, we did a Q & A with one of the authors of the ground-breaking study, Grand Theft [...]

5 Nicholas { 08.03.08 at 9:26 pm }

first i am a teenager and i think u are in over your head when u say the GTA games are bad when i get home from school i like to go sit down and start playing me games i have all the gta games and they are all very good games but look at this how many kids that you know go around hijacking cop cars and beating up randoms with bats i dont i havent even got in troble with the law before i just think you need to do a litte more resurch into your topic seeing as GTA3 was the only voilent game u coverd there are many games were u are the cop doing the good things but it still li9ke in real life involes shooting a bad guy so i think its time u woke up and got over your self

6 Pat Owen { 09.01.08 at 5:05 pm }

If Nicholas is a teenager he would do better to come in from school and read a good book that kept his interest and improved his grammar and punctuation.
This aside, I’ve read part of the resarch by Cutner and Olsen and found it flawed in too many areas to detail fully here. Sufice to say that their claim of being impartial researchers is refuted by the fact that they have an only child, a teen, who has been addicted to video games since he was five. If they found against video games instead of for them, how would that leave their credibility as parents? They had anyway decided years before that video games were ok when their son started picking off the weakest furry animals. No different to picking off the pawns in chess they said and no parent had objected to their kids playing chess. As for their research subjects, they ranged from pre-teen to teen to college kids. How wise, I wonder if they’ve noticed that in UK we have a serious problem with kids killing each other and the killers are not at college, they are more often dropouts who rove in gangs. But people – and legislators – tend to believe ‘Experts’, scary stuff…

7 Drak { 11.13.08 at 8:57 pm }

Violent video games are good. Because they let some kids vent anger in a game instead of taking it out on real life people. I myself have played some of the “shoot-up” games. But did I go rob a bank afterwards? No. I say as long as you tell kids that it’s ok to do the things they see in the game, ONLY in the game. Then they is no real problem with it. Plus it’s just all zero and numbers making up the game anyway. It’s not like you’re killing real people when you do it in the game. So just explain to your kids/teenagers it’s ok to play the game and have fun with it. But nevered to do any of that stuff in real life or on real life people.

8 steven { 11.26.08 at 11:33 am }

i like to say that most violent video games should not be banned but there shouold be an age limit on them like games that are rated M for mature should only be for 13 and up

9 dan { 02.25.09 at 11:42 am }

I spend a long time playing shooters, I haven’t felt any urge whatsoever to attack someone. I think that anyone who claims a video game causes violence are just being idiotic. I am doing a study as to whether games influence people to commit violent acts and so far I have found that 99% of the people i have spoken to and studied do not feel any urge for violence from playing these games. If someone is going to murder someone then they will do that regardless of whether they play a video game or not. In most cases that crime is committed in a similar way to a video game, the perpetrator has a troubled background and are usually below the age to be playing the game in the first place. One case that proved this was the Jamie Bulger murder where the kids murdered Jamie after watching childs play 3. It later came out that they had been abused byt their parents (and they should never have been watching that film as they were not old enough). In most cases it is down to how they have been brought up.

and the comment made by the student that says “some people play squash after work, i squash people” that is most likely a joke.

steven, they do have age ratings. parents just seem to ignore them and then blame game developers when their children go and do something stupid.

10 Anonymous { 03.11.09 at 11:22 am }

this is all crap!!!!!!!!!!! it is this or thay do it for real it is just like punching bag

11 exc { 07.05.09 at 7:42 pm }

I must admit, when I first became aware of shoot-em up games I had in mind games where a player might shoot spaceships out of the sky. Somehow I missed the initial release of the Grand Theft Auto series, becoming aware of the game only as Grand Theft Auto3 was to be released.

wow somebody needs to learn what the term “Shoot em up” means as a genre, because saying that Space Invaders and Ikaruga are in the same genre as a SANDBOX ADVENTURE/3rd person shooter game like GTA, is hilariously ill-informed. Even then, the likes of ‘Quake’ or ‘Call of Duty’ aren’t “shoot em ups” (also called SHMUPS) but are “First person Shooters” different genres fools… Actually research Video games before you start to criticize them

12 styles1005 { 09.21.09 at 2:38 pm }

Oy nutta! Everybody who says this article condemns violent games needs to actually read the whole thing and not just the title. I am using this as a source for an essay pointing out that games do not cause violence. This reminds me of another argument – that over gun rights. Paraphrasing a statement on that subject, “Games don’t kill people; People kill people.” And Drak is exactly right – I make that same point in my essay. In the Columbine shooting, many people think that the kids shot up the shool because of video games. This is not true – many well-reasoned hypotheses state that they shot up the school because of a lack of violent games – the games were being used as an outlet for anger and destructive tendencies that were then funneled into shooting up the school. And by the way GTA is not 3rd person. It is second. You might want to get YOUR facts straight before criticizing somebody else’s. Besides, she admitted that was a mistake. As a general rule, don’t believe anybody if they can’t even spell their argument correctly. Same goes for Nicholas. And dan – good argument, though it could use proper capitalization ;) The reason most killings show similarity to video games is that video games are built to be realistic – within reason of course.

13 shawntay williams { 09.24.10 at 11:20 am }

Video games does create violent acts in many ways.

14 Anon { 03.10.11 at 10:50 pm }

I came across this while searching for more information for my research paper on the correlation between video games and violence. So far, most of what I have found are studies that have no conclusive results and other trustworthy sites that go in depth about how most studies are biased when blaming video games for crime. From what I’ve seen so far, don’t expect to get anywhere blaming games.

Leave a Comment