<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scathing Review of Grand Theft Childhood Appears, Then Disappears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/</link>
	<description>Free Education for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:26:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grand Theft Childhood critic shot down in flames. &#8212; Bruce On Games</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Theft Childhood critic shot down in flames. &#8212; Bruce On Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=259#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>[...] So when Joanne Cantor, Ph.D published a scathing and factually deficient article (reported here at OpenEducation.net) on PsychCentral.com the authors of Grand Theft Childhood asked the editor of the website to take a closer look at the article. He did so, asking for the advice of two outside reviewers. The conclusion was that the Joanne Cantor article &#8220;was not up to the usual standards we look for in our editorial content. There were also questions about specific assertions and accusations.&#8221; So it was pulled from the site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So when Joanne Cantor, Ph.D published a scathing and factually deficient article (reported here at OpenEducation.net) on PsychCentral.com the authors of Grand Theft Childhood asked the editor of the website to take a closer look at the article. He did so, asking for the advice of two outside reviewers. The conclusion was that the Joanne Cantor article &#8220;was not up to the usual standards we look for in our editorial content. There were also questions about specific assertions and accusations.&#8221; So it was pulled from the site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Factually Wrong &#8216;Grand Theft Childhood&#8217; Review Published, Then Removed</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Factually Wrong &#8216;Grand Theft Childhood&#8217; Review Published, Then Removed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=259#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>[...] evidence which was not presented by Cantor, so we&#8217;ll toss that aside as well. Speaking with OpenEducation, Dr. Kutner explained that the title &#8220;Grand Theft Childhood&#8221; was originally the name of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evidence which was not presented by Cantor, so we&#8217;ll toss that aside as well. Speaking with OpenEducation, Dr. Kutner explained that the title &#8220;Grand Theft Childhood&#8221; was originally the name of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sina</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=259#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>I think this issue is indicative, to a lesser extent, of the way research in education is used to push personal agenda.  While, open investigation and argument building is key to any academic discourse, its reviews like the one mentioned in your piece that cause problems for casual readers when trying to make out the facts (or the interpretation of the facts).  Thanks for bring this to the fore.  I&#039;m sure the same principle of debate tensions exist in other issues, including vouchers, busing, policy churn, etc.

Keep it coming,
Sina
http://educationequityinternational.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this issue is indicative, to a lesser extent, of the way research in education is used to push personal agenda.  While, open investigation and argument building is key to any academic discourse, its reviews like the one mentioned in your piece that cause problems for casual readers when trying to make out the facts (or the interpretation of the facts).  Thanks for bring this to the fore.  I&#8217;m sure the same principle of debate tensions exist in other issues, including vouchers, busing, policy churn, etc.</p>
<p>Keep it coming,<br />
Sina<br />
<a href="http://educationequityinternational.org" rel="nofollow">http://educationequityinternational.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mainstream Media and Idealogical Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mainstream Media and Idealogical Attacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=259#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>[...] Full story.   This entry was posted on Thursday, June 26th, 2008 and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full story.   This entry was posted on Thursday, June 26th, 2008 and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
