<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scathing Review of Grand Theft Childhood Appears, Then Disappears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/</link>
	<description>Free Education for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sina</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2008/06/25/scathing-review-of-grand-theft-childhood-appears-then-disappears/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=259#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>I think this issue is indicative, to a lesser extent, of the way research in education is used to push personal agenda.  While, open investigation and argument building is key to any academic discourse, its reviews like the one mentioned in your piece that cause problems for casual readers when trying to make out the facts (or the interpretation of the facts).  Thanks for bring this to the fore.  I&#039;m sure the same principle of debate tensions exist in other issues, including vouchers, busing, policy churn, etc.

Keep it coming,
Sina
http://educationequityinternational.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this issue is indicative, to a lesser extent, of the way research in education is used to push personal agenda.  While, open investigation and argument building is key to any academic discourse, its reviews like the one mentioned in your piece that cause problems for casual readers when trying to make out the facts (or the interpretation of the facts).  Thanks for bring this to the fore.  I&#8217;m sure the same principle of debate tensions exist in other issues, including vouchers, busing, policy churn, etc.</p>
<p>Keep it coming,<br />
Sina<br />
<a href="http://educationequityinternational.org" rel="nofollow">http://educationequityinternational.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

