Obama a Republican? President Parts with Democrats on School Improvement Measures
There are of course many folks who think President Barack Obama is trying to do too much too soon. Republicans, looking for every chance to assert their differences, have hammered on the president in recent days for not focusing his attention solely on the economy.
However, having run a campaign featuring the word hope and the call for a better future, the president has always insisted he would look to rebuild our country if given the chance to lead. Provided with that chance, on Tuesday Obama took a much-needed step toward a more prosperous country by addressing America’s maligned educational system.
And this time, he took a play out of the recent Republican playbook with calls for greater accountability and his endorsement of a GOP mainstay, the idea of school choice. But he did so on his terms and his steadfast focus on a long-term approach to rebuilding the country.
Pay for Teacher Performance
In direct opposition to the current position of the teachers unions, Obama called for measures to link teachers’ pay to student performance. Insisting that “the United States must drastically improve student achievement to regain lost international standing,” the president laid the groundwork for merit pay for teachers.
The concept is in direct opposition to the union position and the current trend to pay teachers according to their credentials and years of experience. While those elements could still form some basis of the pay scale in the future, Obama seeks to base raises on teacher effectiveness as measured by the performance levels of that teacher’s students.
In unveiling his push, President Obama acknowledged that he was in direct conflict with the union position. And since those unions make up a large segment of the Democratic Party, his position was also in conflict with a large segment of his own base of supporters.
But the change is remarkably consistent with his prior day’s speech regarding science and stem cell research. Instead of basing his decision on past practice or the view points of certain supporters, the president was acknowledging that all research points to higher student achievement levels in those classrooms where teachers excelled at their craft.
While some wanted to parse the president’s words regarding student performance, the tie to student achievement was not one of those areas he was willing to give in on. In clear, distinct support that student performance would be a factor in the merit pay concept, Education Secretary Arne Duncan told The Associated Press:
“What you want to do is really identify the best and brightest by a range of metrics, including student achievement.”
Expansion of Charter Schools
Obama also called for the expansion of innovative charter schools, another initiative that has long been opposed by the members of teachers unions. Charter schools are publicly funded but are operating independently of many of the constraints that current public schools face. They also are a key component of the move towards giving parents a choice as to where to send their children.
Critics insist that charter schools are being held to a different standard even as they drain precious resources from the established public schools. Those same critics believe the resource drainage come in two forms. First, there are the funds to pay for the schools. Second, there is the belief that charter schools are siphoning off the stronger, more motivated students, leaving public schools to work with the less-capable and the disinterested.
In direct opposition to those who want to see limits on the number of charter schools, Obama was unrelenting. Stating that many of the innovations in education today are taking place in charter schools, Obama insisted that placing limits on the number of such schools is not “good for our children, our economy or our country.”
Tackling Another Longstanding Issue
As if that were not enough, Obama also moved to one of the other growing criticisms of schools – the time kids spend in the classroom. In addition to the controversial proposals of merit pay and increased numbers of charter schools, the president insisted it was time for a longer school day and school years.
Ironically, while many of his positions were counter to that of the unions, the initial response of union leaders was remarkably positive. That view appeared to come primarily from Obama’s pledge to include educators in the process, a step that his predecessor is generally charged with avoiding virtually every step of the way.
In addition, the president did continue his support for at least one position not supported by the GOP, more money for early childhood education. That no doubt helped win him some additional support from educators.
While the economic stimulus bill is set to automatically provide additional funds for education over the next two years, some of those dollars are already supposed to be tied to teacher quality and on states developing better systems for tracking overall student progress.
Talking about Improving Education
While against union positions, Democrats have to be happy that Obama is putting education front and center. More importantly, Republicans and Democrats alike have to be happy that the president is willing to examine ideas from both sides of the aisle to ensure improvement in our schools.
While the economy is critical, school improvement is also one of America’s most pressing problems moving forward, especially when we consider our country’s long term viability in a global marketplace.
Flickr photos courtesy of BarackObamadotcom, Obama-Biden Transition Project and esagor.

4 comments
I get the concept of “merit pay”. I find it difficult, however, to measure student performance (grades for instance) and say that performance all stems from the teacher.
Some students are just rebellious these days. Are we supposed to penalize teachers for a failing student who has no respect for authority?
I echo Johanne’s comment. I have taught some difficult classes where the majority of students are repeating for at least the second time. I’m proud that they would all get through with a tremendous amount of work on their and my part but it would often be by the barest minimum.
Then my senior science class would all be in the 90s as they were self actuated and competing for university entrance.
Should I be penalized for my teaching assignment even though I was very successful?
Merit pay for teacher’s is a way to motivate teachers to unite against the bureaucracy that holds good teachers back. Blaming the students does not work. If you don’t understand this, then Google Jaime Escalante to better understand the problem that we are faced with. This is also the reason for charter schools. To learn how this all got so bad to begin with research the writings of retired teacher John Taylor Gatto.
I think that the idea of Merit pay is ridiculous. There are good teachers, that just happen to teach difficult classes, and there are bad teachers that just happen to teach easy classes. So is this idea really going to award the PE teacher with money while the AP Physics teacher is getting nothing even though their doing what they’re supposed to? I don’t think this is a good idea at all.
Leave a Comment