<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Education Leads to Prosperity, Every Student Should Have the Opportunity for College</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openeducation.net/2009/06/18/if-education-leads-to-prosperity-every-student-should-have-the-opportunity-for-college/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2009/06/18/if-education-leads-to-prosperity-every-student-should-have-the-opportunity-for-college/</link>
	<description>Free Education for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:50:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Thibault</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2009/06/18/if-education-leads-to-prosperity-every-student-should-have-the-opportunity-for-college/comment-page-1/#comment-6729</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Thibault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=2016#comment-6729</guid>
		<description>I agree that the costs are prohibitive and that the actual benefit of a degree from an inept institution is not as valuable as it once was.  

But these are unaligned aspects of the problem with higher education today.  I think we need to figure out what we are so concerned about in higher education and focus on that, if getting a degree isn&#039;t worth nearly as much, then students not getting into college are receiving a favor (namely no debt and the short road to a profession)...

It&#039;s not that I&#039;m not all for equity in college admissions and outcomes, it&#039;s just that if we truly believe the value of a bachelors or masters has decreased then there arises a host of other issues facing the US.  

I still tend to think that our post-secondary education system is world class, but if I were in a place to affect policy I would be putting more funding and energy into the development of strong, flexible, and career specific 2 year (or less) programs.  The shortage of nursing alone is a great example of how a 2 year program could easily meet the current demands of a national crisis, and yet, many of these programs have 2-3 year waiting lists forcing those students with the means to go after a 4 year program.   That doesn&#039;t make a lick of sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the costs are prohibitive and that the actual benefit of a degree from an inept institution is not as valuable as it once was.  </p>
<p>But these are unaligned aspects of the problem with higher education today.  I think we need to figure out what we are so concerned about in higher education and focus on that, if getting a degree isn&#8217;t worth nearly as much, then students not getting into college are receiving a favor (namely no debt and the short road to a profession)&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m not all for equity in college admissions and outcomes, it&#8217;s just that if we truly believe the value of a bachelors or masters has decreased then there arises a host of other issues facing the US.  </p>
<p>I still tend to think that our post-secondary education system is world class, but if I were in a place to affect policy I would be putting more funding and energy into the development of strong, flexible, and career specific 2 year (or less) programs.  The shortage of nursing alone is a great example of how a 2 year program could easily meet the current demands of a national crisis, and yet, many of these programs have 2-3 year waiting lists forcing those students with the means to go after a 4 year program.   That doesn&#8217;t make a lick of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
