<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCLB and the Closing of Achievement Gaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openeducation.net/2010/03/10/nclb-and-the-closing-of-achievement-gaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2010/03/10/nclb-and-the-closing-of-achievement-gaps/</link>
	<description>Free Education for All</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 00:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony G.</title>
		<link>http://www.openeducation.net/2010/03/10/nclb-and-the-closing-of-achievement-gaps/#comment-8428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openeducation.net/?p=2904#comment-8428</guid>
		<description>Great article.  I&#039;ve been concerned about the use of a binary definition of proficiency for a while (you&#039;re either proficient or not), with no attention being paid to the level of proficiency.  This research is exactly what I expected to see.  Thank you for the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  I&#8217;ve been concerned about the use of a binary definition of proficiency for a while (you&#8217;re either proficient or not), with no attention being paid to the level of proficiency.  This research is exactly what I expected to see.  Thank you for the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

